The Hidden Costs of Pay Transparency: The Development of a Model

Snider, J.B., Scott, K.L., Mulvey, P.W.

JB Snider, KL Scott, PW Mulvey - Compensation & Benefits …, 2026 - journals.sagepub.com

0 citations2026DOI: 10.1177/08863687251399485

Summary

Snider, Scott, and Mulvey's research, "The Hidden Costs of Pay Transparency: The Development of a Model," investigates the less-explored negative organizational consequences of increased pay transparency, a growing directive from governments and stakeholders. While pay transparency is often advocated for its potential benefits, this study highlights its potential to foster detrimental outcomes within organizations. The authors developed a model to explain these hidden costs, particularly focusing on the emotional and behavioral responses of employees. The methodology involved testing their hypotheses using a multiround simulation-based laboratory experiment, allowing for a controlled environment to observe employee reactions to varying levels of pay transparency. Through this experimental approach, they were able to examine the causal relationships between pay transparency, emotional states, and subsequent behaviors. A key finding was that pay transparency can have an adverse effect on "helping" behaviors among employees. This reduction in helping is significantly explained by the positive association between pay transparency and "episodic envy". The model further incorporates the role of individual differences, specifically highlighting how "social value orientations" (including individualism beliefs and prosocial motivation) influence these reactions. By distinguishing the interpersonal focus of envy from the broader retaliatory scope of anger, the research enhances the understanding of the complex emotional dynamics that shape employee responses to transparent pay practices. Furthermore, the study proposes that a positive "organizational justice climate" could serve as a moderator, buffering the impact of unfavorable pay comparisons on negative emotions and, consequently, reducing undesirable workplace behaviors. The implications of this paper are significant for both theory and practice. Theoretically, it advances the understanding of emotional responses in the workplace, particularly how specific emotions like envy are triggered by organizational policies such as pay transparency. It also contributes to the literature on organizational justice by suggesting mechanisms through which a just climate can mitigate negative outcomes. For practitioners, the findings underscore the importance of carefully considering the implementation of pay transparency initiatives. Organizations are encouraged to anticipate and actively work to mitigate the potential for increased envy and reduced prosocial behaviors among employees. Developing and maintaining a strong organizational justice climate is presented as a crucial strategy to counteract these hidden costs and prevent counterproductive work behaviors. The research also opens avenues for future inquiry into the nuanced interplay of emotions, individual differences, and organizational context in shaping responses to transparency.

Key Findings

  • - Pay transparency can lead to negative organizational outcomes, specifically an adverse effect on employee helping behaviors.
  • This reduction in helping behavior is largely driven by an increase in "episodic envy" among employees when pay information is transparent.
  • Individual differences, particularly in "social value orientations" such as individualism beliefs and prosocial motivation, play a moderating role in how pay transparency leads to envy and affects helping.
  • The model differentiates between the emotional dynamics of envy (interpersonal focus) and anger (broader retaliatory scope) in response to pay transparency.
  • A positive organizational justice climate is posited to moderate the influence of unfavorable pay comparisons on negative emotions, thereby mitigating undesirable work behaviors.