A cognitive evaluation and equity-based perspective of pay for performance on job performance: A meta-analysis and path model

Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhou, J., Liu, C., Zhang, X.

Y Chen, Z Zhang, J Zhou, C Liu, X Zhang… - Frontiers in …, 2023 - frontiersin.org

61 citations2023DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1039375/full

Summary

The research paper, "A cognitive evaluation and equity-based perspective of pay for performance on job performance: A meta-analysis and path model," by Chen, Zhang, Zhou, Liu, Zhang, and Yu, published in 2023, addresses the ongoing debate regarding whether pay for performance (PFP) enhances or diminishes job performance. To provide a comprehensive understanding, the authors conducted a meta-analysis, synthesizing findings from 100 articles, which included 108 independent samples and a total of 71,438 employees. This robust methodology allowed for an in-depth examination of the complex mechanisms through which PFP influences both task and contextual performance. The study aimed to clarify the direct relationship, explore the mediating roles of cognitive and equity-based factors, and identify potential moderating variables. The findings indicate a positive relationship between pay for performance and overall job performance. Specifically, PFP showed a more substantial positive effect on task performance compared to contextual performance in workplace settings. From a cognitive evaluation perspective, the study revealed that PFP enhances both task and contextual performance by boosting employees' intrinsic motivation. However, it can also weaken both types of performance by increasing employee pressure. The equity perspective highlighted that the relationship between PFP and task performance was partially mediated by employees' perceptions of distributive justice and procedural justice, with distributive justice having a more pronounced mediating effect. For contextual performance, only procedural justice was found to partially mediate the relationship with PFP. Furthermore, the study identified significant moderating effects, suggesting that the impact of PFP varies depending on the specific measures of pay for performance employed and the national culture in which it is implemented. These insights contribute to a more nuanced understanding of PFP's multifaceted effects and offer practical guidance for organizations seeking to optimize its benefits.

Key Findings

  • - Pay for performance generally has a positive relationship with overall job performance.
  • The positive effect of pay for performance is more substantial on task performance than on contextual performance.
  • Pay for performance enhances job performance by increasing intrinsic motivation but can weaken it by increasing employee pressure.
  • Employee perceptions of distributive justice and procedural justice partially mediate the relationship between pay for performance and task performance, with distributive justice having a stronger influence.
  • The impact of pay for performance is moderated by the specific measures of PFP used and the prevailing national culture.